home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.sprintlink.net!rockyd!cmcl2!schonberg!dewar
- From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.edu,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.modula2,comp.lang.modula3
- Subject: Re: Hungarian notation
- Date: 13 Jan 1996 17:13:17 -0500
- Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
- Message-ID: <dewar.821571143@schonberg>
- References: <30C40F77.53B5@swsbbs.com> <30EF0415.6FE1@tus.ssi1.com> <1996Jan7.045815.8676@ohstpy> <4cpb00$nqk@news.xmission.com> <hawkfish-0801960904580001@blv-pm3-ip24.halcyon.com> <4csj8i$gsa@news.xmission.com> <hawkfish-1201961907010001@blv-pm11-ip27.halcyon.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: schonberg.cs.nyu.edu
- X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 (NOV)
-
- rmgw said
-
- "Unfortuantely, I've found that it is more than "syntactic-saccharine". One
- of the things that drove me nuts when I was working with Windoze was that
- no one had any idea how big an index was supposed to be. This caused me
- more tahn one serious problem with overflow when 16 bit ints were used
- instead of longs by people who weren't thinking."
-
- That of course is something that is clearly a defect of the language,
- since this confusion is a static typing error in any well typed language.
- Furthermore the overflows should be cleanly caught.
-
-